Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Biol Direct ; 15(1): 21, 2020 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-901910

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreaded rapidly worldwide, as far as it has become a global pandemic. Therefore, the introduction of serological tests for determination of IgM and IgG antibodies has become the main diagnostic tool, useful for tracking the spread of the virus and for consequently allowing its containment. In our study we compared point of care test (POCT) lateral flow immunoassay (FIA) vs automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), in order to assess their specificity and sensibility for COVID-19 antibodies detection. RESULTS: We find that different specificities and sensitivities for IgM and IgG tests. Notably IgM POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) has a low sensitivity (0.526), while IgG POCT FIA method vs CLIA method (gold standard) test has a much higher sensitivity (0.937); further, with respect of IgG, FIA and CLIA could arguably provide equivalent information. CONCLUSIONS: FIA method could be helpful in assessing in short time, the possible contagiousness of subjects that for work reasons cannot guarantee "social distancing".


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Pruebas Serológicas , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoensayo , Inmunoglobulina M/metabolismo , Mediciones Luminiscentes , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Dominios Proteicos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/química , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA